Management Information System

25 Responses to “Silly Scientists – Prove “Intelligent Design” – AGAIN!”

1. thefencejumperengine on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

   @ppsimmons. Got it …
   @ppsimmons. Got it. Thanks.

2. ppsimmons on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

   @ …
   @thefencejumperengine – The answer to your question IS MOST clearly answered in the Bible – that is the FOUNDATION for all truth. That is my answer.

3. thefencejumperengine on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

   @ppsimmons. Thank …
   @ppsimmons. Thank you for your answer. But, it didn’t really answer my question. Would you be able to answer the question again without refering to the Bible?

4. ppsimmons on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

   @ …
   @thefencejumperengine – It is NEVER an insult to ask an honest – sincere question. The Bible tells us that God is “eternal” – He has no beginning and no end. He is all things and in Him all things hold together. We are but ONE of His creations. God is the ultimate reality – therefore he needs no beginning and will have no end. Hope this helps.

5. thefencejumperengine on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

   @ppsimmons. I am …
   @ppsimmons. I am just curios and don’t want to insult anybody. But if God created man, who created then God?

6. m1tchish on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

   This video is GOLD. …
   This video is GOLD…Frankenscience is MYRHmering…
   IT’S ALIVE…

7. ppsimmons on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

   @ …
   @BrightStaroftheDawn – Dear sir – your question is a good one and an age-old one – yet, it is clearly answered in the Bible – We live in a FALLEN creation due to man’s rebellion against God from the beginning. All WILL be made right and perfect again – probably soon. But, not now. Right now – we are in a “test” – will you choose Jesus – inspight of the fallen condition and injustices of the world? If your answer to that is YES – then you will see paradise. If it is NO – then you will not.

8. BrightStaroftheDawn on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

   So scientists who …
   So scientists who CREATED this, is proof of an intelligent “designer”.
   Maybe, if your talking about the scientist, yes.

   But if you are talking about a Being who Designed everything, I ask the same Being who ( it is Who, right?) created man woman the earth the universe and everything in it……………………..
   was that Beings intelligence that used when that Being ALSO made MRSA, smallpox, AIDS,cancers, mental retardation, forms of cancer or congenital deforrmities?

9. stefenski on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

   good video.
   ‘mind …
   good video.
   ‘mind is the builder’ as edgar cayce would say.

   if you want to, have a listen to the wise spirit guide ’silver birch speaks’ about life here and hereafter , proving that life is eternal and intelligent.

10. ppsimmons on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    @FiverBeyond – The …
    @FiverBeyond – The film answers all of your questions – clearly, precisely and pointedly. Sorry you missed it. Could it be that you have your own agenda? Nah – that couldn’t be it. Sorry – my bad.

11. FiverBeyond on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    @rcfreak7777

    I …
    @rcfreak7777

    I honestly don’t understand why Creationists are up in arms about this breakthrough. So far I haven’t heard a single evolutionary biologist in any way suggest that this synthetic life somehow supports the Theory of Evolution. Why would it?

12. FiverBeyond on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    @ppsimmons
    …
    @ppsimmons
    Mauzzzie makes a good point here, ppsimmons: how does the fact that these scientists created life support Intelligent Design?

    Or, since your goal in this video is to say that they did NOT create life, would you care to answer this simple question:

    Which one is evidence supporting Intelligent Design?
    1.) The scientists created life.
    2.) The scientists did not create life.

13. rcfreak7777 on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    @muncastro, First …
    @muncastro, First to prove that anything beyond the micro level can happen we must demonstrate an occurance. To run around saying “well because we can see a saint bernard and a chiwawa are soo diffrent, we also must assume at some point they will change into another kind of being over time”. Well this is called an extrapolation. Everything in evolution is based off of extrapolations. So its not surrendering anything at all actually.

14. rcfreak7777 on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    @mauzzzie, what new …
    @mauzzzie, what new life did “US” create? I see no new life. I see some more bull crap from the evo’s trying to push another pile of horse dung down our throats. Hey, when they can take non-life, and create life let me know. When they form something from dead matter let me know. When the create a living cell from a non-living substance let me know. Until then “WE’ prove nothing, but give more glory to a more amazing God.

15. MathematiclObjection on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    And then I asked …
    And then I asked something very simple: I asked “So WHY does there not have to be a why?”

    Being a good person, he said,”That’s a good question.
    Asking that question would lead us into a circle of trying to get the other to answer first. Here’s my answer to your question though, out of 100% honesty.
    I don’t know.
    But that doesn’t mean that there’s a, ‘WHY’”.

16. MathematiclObjection on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    1. There doesn’t …
    1. There doesn’t have to be a, “Why.”
    2. a. It’s a point of view. b. People decide what’s right and wrong in their eyes based on their opinions.
    3. Pleasure is a desire. Instead of an instinct to do a woman for the survival of the species, we’re “tricked” into impregnating them with pleasure as the tool. Much akin to dolphins.
    4. Because you get to see humans everywhere else for free. Zero profit margine.
    5. My dog, since I’m more emotionally attached.
    Stupid questions… Easy.

17. MathematiclObjection on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    I certainly hope …
    I certainly hope this particular user doesn’t get angry at me for posting this on his channel, bur Dr. Simmons, I found a Christian user, trying to preach and him asking questions to atheists, and I found one response from I’m assuming an atheist user, and it said:

18. ppsimmons on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    @mauzzzie The first …
    @mauzzzie The first part of your premise proves the fallacy of the whole argument. “Life evolved from nonliving elements.” REALLY? When, where and how has that EVER been demonstrated or observed? You make the leap from abiogenesis or chemosynthesis all the way to humans manipulating already living substances and then ask ME – “where is the logic?” Unbelievable. THIS is the ignorance of evolution “science.” Thank you for demonstrating it in your question.

19. captianusa on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    Ignorant atheists …
    Ignorant atheists busted again.
    Good job ppsimmons !

20. mauzzzie on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    So why exactly is …
    So why exactly is the following scenario NOT possible:
    life evolved from nonliving elements. We evolved from the most primitive life forms. Since we’re here now we can with our intelligence create new life.
    Explain to me how us being able to create new life PROVES that WE OURSELVES have been created. WHY? Where’s the logic???

21. MathematiclObjection on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    Apparently, ” …
    Apparently, “creationistcrap” was slithering around here like a snake and commented on my channel. I blocked him and removed his post. Apparently, he gets pretty angry when Christians outsmart him.

22. ppsimmons on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    @MultiArchangel – …
    @MultiArchangel – You have got him pegged. Exactly why I do not approve any of his comments here. I could care less what his 250 viewers think. In the meantime we have over 4 million viewers and 6,200 subs to date. I will not give him free advertising on our vids. Thanks for the update. God Bless.

23. MultiArchangel on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    @ppsimmons – I just …
    @ppsimmons – I just went over to his channel (CreationistCrap). It is an epic troll account. Just wants to annoy us by letting the atheists bash you on his channel. He is a joke. I know a friend of mine named shockofgod who has a youtube channel made by an atheist and they simply post his latest videos and they allow the people to comment on it as if it were shock’s channel. They just need something to vent on. They are like children that just throw tantrums when they do not get their way. ROFL

24. ppsimmons on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    @overlordcacius – …
    @overlordcacius – SEE our film – IS GOD SPEAKING THROUGH DNA – you might be especially entertained (OR) enlightened. Thanks for watching this one. Got you thinking anyway – obviously.

25. Serotis on June 9th, 2010 at 12:43 am

    I like very much …
    I like very much your videos, keep going, it is inspiring

Leave a Reply