Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 15
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 15
Some people can’t read a page and tell you what it said afterwards. Imagine what happens to a book with them.
In David Ovason’s book, he first compares a triangle of stars in the sky to a right angled triangle on the ground, saying that the fit is almost exact.
Later when telling about how the Washington Monument was moved to the south and to the east (changing a 90 degree angle to 97 degrees), he suggests that final placement and the move was to better represent the triangle in the sky.
That is, in the end, he embraces the ‘final placement’ view and not the right angle triangle view. And after having said that the first one matched almost exactly, he says the same thing of the second triangle.
To top this off, we find Robert Hieronimus writing that Ovason now says that the Federal Triangle matches the right angle in the sky bperfectly – the exact opposite of what Ovason actually says.
And he wrote that after reading my critique of Ovason’s work and devoting five pages of the book to my work.
Bigbytes
Duration : 0:6:44
[youtube gFlv-S0T45M]