This is a video response to Rose Hill, Maryland: Center line datum for Washington D.C.? located at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6uZpe-KV5M&feature=channel_page
The main premise is that the point of beginning for the survey of Washington DC was on the east side of the Potomac? He suggests that the Rose Hill Estate locates the center line for something in DC. Rose Hill is at 77 01 30 while the center line of the district is at about 77 02 26.
He claims specifically that Rose Hill is on the EXACT same longitude as the Jefferson Memorial, located at 77 02 12? He also claims that the top corner and side of the district aligns with Monticello (on a 45 degree bearing). Go to a page where you can do distance and bearing calculations between locations http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/distance.html , there you can check this young man’s facts.
You can also go to http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/sprong.html , enter a beginning coordinate and bearing and distance, and it will tell you the end point of that line. Very useful in studies like these, if you can use them?
This guy can’t seem to get it right.
Bigbytes
Duration : 0:2:32
Read the rest of this entry »
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 15
Some people can’t read a page and tell you what it said afterwards. Imagine what happens to a book with them.
In David Ovason’s book, he first compares a triangle of stars in the sky to a right angled triangle on the ground, saying that the fit is almost exact.
Later when telling about how the Washington Monument was moved to the south and to the east (changing a 90 degree angle to 97 degrees), he suggests that final placement and the move was to better represent the triangle in the sky.
That is, in the end, he embraces the ‘final placement’ view and not the right angle triangle view. And after having said that the first one matched almost exactly, he says the same thing of the second triangle.
To top this off, we find Robert Hieronimus writing that Ovason now says that the Federal Triangle matches the right angle in the sky bperfectly – the exact opposite of what Ovason actually says.
And he wrote that after reading my critique of Ovason’s work and devoting five pages of the book to my work.
Bigbytes
Duration : 0:6:44
Read the rest of this entry »
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 11
Duration : 0:7:20
Read the rest of this entry »
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 11
Duration : 0:7:20
Read the rest of this entry »
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 8
The Lisbon Rose Line
The Mason Dixon Line
The Transpenninsular Line
Duration : 0:8:34
Read the rest of this entry »
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 10
Duration : 0:7:34
Read the rest of this entry »
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 13
Thomas Jefferson promoted the township/range grid model which features a 6×6 mile grid. In mathematical terms, this is called the square of the sun and features the first 36 numbers which happen to total to 666.
The Saturn square consists of nine cells and totals to 45. Rows, columns and diagonals add to 15.
Noah’s Ark was 300×50x30. 3×3 = 9, 3×5 = 15 and 3×3x5 = 45. The name Adam (ADM) totals to 45. Note that the end of the ark was 50×30 or 5×3.
The Ark of the Covenant was 2.5 x 1.5 x 1.5 or 5×3x3. One side of the ark was 3×5. The altar in front of the Tabernacle was a 5×5 surface 3 cubits tall. We have a Mars square on top and a 3×5 side. The DC boundary is a 10×10 earth square.
The Holy of Holies was a 20×20x20 cube. There is no mathematical square for 2.
We can convert the Noah’s Ark numbers from 300×50x30 to 360×60x36. 60×360 is a band 30 degrees above and below the equator, all way round the world. 30 degrees north is where the Great Pyramid was placed. Mercury, the most eccentric planet, ranges just beyond that, so this band, the zodiac band, marks where the planetary spheres roam.
The sanctuary in Ezekiel’s Oblation is 500 x 500. Remember that 25 is the Mars number which relates to the earth square, since quartering the 25 Mars cells gives us the 100 earth cells. My point is that the circumference of the earth is recognized as being 24,900 miles.
Duration : 0:7:58
Read the rest of this entry »
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 16
In his book “Secret Architecture of Our Nation’s Capital”, David Ovason suggests that Pennsylvania Avenue was aligned to one sunset on one day, Aug 10th.
The suggestion is that one sunset determined the angle of PA, and that this angle was chosen because it matched an angle in triangle of stars in the sky.
There are two problems with that notion. The angle in the sky triangle is over 30 degrees, while the one on the ground is less than 20.
Also, the sun sets twice a year over Penn Ave, yet Ovason never mentions the May sunset in his book.
Bigbytes
Duration : 0:8:8
Read the rest of this entry »
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 2
Here we examine the claim that St Peter’s at the Vatican aligns to the Equinoxes, to Easter sunrise and to St Sophia in Istanbul, located 9/10’s of a degree further south than Rome, where the Vatican is.
Please see “The Sun in the Church” available online:
http://books.google.com/books?id=mZWy0xPxj3EC&dq=sun+in+the+church&printsec=frontcover&source=bn&hl=en&ei=Qp9YSp28G4KHtgecnqXdCg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4
On his web page he still claims that “The line from the Vatican seems to intersect the grounds of Hajia St. Sophia at about an 88.6 degree TN bearing. On Google Earth the line seems to lead right to the dome of St. Sophia at this angle”.
The he suggests that St Peter’s is aimed at the equinox due east? If it is oriented due east, and St Sophia is south of there, it does not line up with that. 90 degrees is the number you want not 88.6.
Duration : 0:4:6
Read the rest of this entry »
Geomantic Misinformation Systems Part 12
Note that in terms of mathematical magic squares, the square of Mars is a 5×5 grid. The earth’s number is 10.
Quartering all the cells in the Mars square produces the 100 cell earth square. You will notice that the District of Columbia is a 10×10 miles area that features a pentagram in the map and the Pentagon Building.
What numbers do you imagine they were trying to emphasize?
Duration : 0:8:14
Read the rest of this entry »